As a Midwesterner, it is absolutely bonkers to me how common it appears to be for HVAC systems to get installed in attics.
Don't do that. Stop doing that! WTF?
That's bad enough, but then you go and run the ducts up there, too?
Y'all.
If you keep the system and the ducts within the space you're trying to heat and cool, you don't have to account for any losses, now, do ya?
Put the air handler in a utility closet. Run ducts /below/ the ceiling. Enclose with soffiting if you must.
The end.
This is a test rant for a future video that may or may not happen.
But seriously, I cannot fathom how HVAC stuff in attics (or crawlspaces!) got normalized. Especially in new construction.
You virtually never see that around here (the most common application is old homes with radiators for heat who want to add central air) and for good reason!
@TechConnectify You’re not wrong, you’re just advocating the wrong solution. Conditioned attic spaces with insulation under the roof deck is the best approach for slab on grade new construction with high solar loads and AC demands.
@transcendentape But that's the thing, isn't it? A conditioned attic space becomes a conditioned space.
If you want to spend the money to turn it into one, I ain't gonna stop you. But most people just leave their attic an attic for one reason or another. And if that's the route they've chosen, ducts and the air handler should go somewhere else.
Plus, in many of the homes I'm talking about, the attic ain't tall enough to turn into a useful space anyway.
@TechConnectify The point of making an attic include d into the conditioned space isn’t to reduce the relatively minimal AC losses, it’s to deal with the condensation that results when an attic that reaches 150F and 80% humidity reaches an interior space conditioned to 75F or so. Your solution doesn’t address the fundamental problem we deal with in the South where we have night-time temperatures higher than desirable, high humidity, and no basements.
@TechConnectify What is fundamentally different between a wall and a roof? A wall can be shaded from the vast majority of solar thermal load simply by building overhangs. The roof cannot.
@TechConnectify So, instead of continuing the building scheme we’ve used since before there was A/C, it’s better to remove the pressure cooker that is an attic entirely. Is it cheap? No. But in new construction, the price differential is a handful of dollars per square foot and in my area, far superior than any other alternative.
@transcendentape I mean, if you want to remove the attic space, go ahead.
But understand that for homes around here, *NOTHING* goes in the attic. The attic has tons of vents at the eaves and the peaks to keep air flowing through it. Does it get beastly hot up there when the sun shines? Absolutely! But there's a layer of R-50 insulation above the ceiling to battle that intrusion.
And that beats the pants off of any insulated ductwork.
@TechConnectify I mean, go ahead. We live in entirely different climates with entirely different residential construction norms.
@transcendentape my central point is that I think people in different climates could learn a thing or two from us. Our summers can be just as bad as down South, if less consistently. Perhaps that's the only reason our attics don't get moldy, but I'm doubtful.
You pointed to duct losses as minimal, but the first estimate I found puts them at 25-40%. That's a lot of energy being wasted and money being spent to condition space you're not in.
We just... don't do that.
@transcendentape our M.O. has largely been to treat the attic as a space which is there to frame the roof and that's it.
It's functionally outside, so once the sun sets the conditions up there equalize with the outdoors quickly. And sometimes we even use a fan controlled by a thermostat to force some airflow! But that's relatively uncommon.
From my perspective, the reason we don't deal with mold is mostly that there's nothing up there colder than ambient temps.
@TechConnectify “It’s functionally outside”
This gets to the heart of the matter. I don’t think you appropriately appreciate how bad attics are in my climate.
Pre-A/C, homes were built with 10 or 12 foot ceilings and windows to allow cool air in the bottom and warm air out the top. When we got A/C and started insulating walls, we ran into all kinds of problems with mold. Walls can be protected by rooves, but there’s nothing to protect the roof.
@transcendentape Well, to be honest, I'm confused by what you mean by "bad attics." Can you elaborate?
But to circle back to the climates things, when you say "started insulating walls" - this is it right here. We've been doing that *forever* because we have to. And absolutely critical to that is a nice thick blanket of insulation above the ceiling. It doesn't really matter how hot the roof (or attic) gets when you have that barrier in-place.
@TechConnectify As a matter of fact we have not been doing that forever, at least in my climate. This is precisely the confident ignorance that I am upset with you about.
@transcendentape OK... let's rewind, here.
This whole discussion is about regional/climactic norms. It started with my challenging them, and you described what's done in your area as "the best approach"
Really, all I'm trying to do is challenge that, and offer up what's been normal here for a long time as an alternative. Perhaps, if someone ventured to try building a home down there just like we do up here, it would be much more comfortable and take less energy to cool.
But, perhaps not.
@TechConnectify You could test that hypothesis by observing what good homebuilders are building.
Matt Risinger is an Austin,TX homebuilder that deals extensively with these kind of questions, and he has a Youtube channel that covers a lot of the issues we’ve covered.
@transcendentape I'm familiar with those channels, and Risinger specifically! I largely like a lot of what they feature, but there's other things I totally don't.
For instance, I think tankless water heaters are extremely overrated and a barrier to home electrification. And I'm still perplexed by the attic thing - I need to log off soon but I want to repose my thoughts here on last time in a different way:
@transcendentape What does the air handler do? It produces the cool (or warm) air that you need, and it costs you money to use it. Therefore, that air has a raw dollar cost and you probably want to minimize waste.
This is the raw crux of my whole deal. It seems entirely self-evident to me that you should put the machine that costs money to use inside the space you want it to heat and cool. And, you should keep all components of that machine (i.e. ducts) in that space, too.
@transcendentape To accept less is akin to throwing out a slice or two of bread with every loaf you buy.
Perhaps it's just my Midwestern cheapskate mindset, but I feel it's not actually hard at all to design an HVAC system to guarantee that all hot/cool air it produces stays within the envelope and accepting anything less is just... absolutely strange!
You can /completely/ design those losses out of the system, so I think you should.
Now, with that, good night.