mas.to is one of the many independent Mastodon servers you can use to participate in the fediverse.
Hello! mas.to is a fast, up-to-date and fun Mastodon server.

Administered by:

Server stats:

12K
active users

I recently noticed that the State of Illinois has changed the font of the *stamping* on license plates.

The design is the same, but the stamped text is a bit thinner and the glyphs are blockier.

I am surprised how much this change is bothering me, to be honest. It has never occurred to me how much that is a defining feature. The first one I saw I assumed had to be fake!

But - I'm relieved they're still being stamped.

Shame on all the states that just print them now. Cheapskates.

@TechConnectify Yeah, but look at all the REALLY COOL plates you can get in Arizona now! Seriously, I do think some are awesome and it's an easy way for the state to make money.

Now if only the other states could catch up and get rid of the front plate too!

I'd like to see something replace plates altogether. They have a lot of flaws.

Technology Connections

@weiln I disagree so hard on the front plate thing.

Several hit-and-runs get solved every year because the front plate fell off and was left at the scene. I really do not understand the aversion to putting another $1 piece of metal on the front of your car other than aesthetic preferences, and when we're dealing with machines that can kill people aesthetic preferences like that can go eff allllll the way off.

@TechConnectify Hence my desire to replace, or complement, plates.

I argue that if safety was the requirement then we'd require plates on the sides. The number of times they would be more useful as a pedestrian is greater than the number of times I wish there was a front plate. I don't deny that front plates aren't useful, but they're not THAT helpful or all states would have them.

But seriously, there should be a better way to manage this now. Especially if cops don't enforce anything.

@weiln but why, specifically, does one more plate on the front bother you? If you think there should be a compliment to the one rear plate, and there is one (it's called the front plate) your argument feels incredibly inconsistent.

Would another identifier on the sides be a cool idea? Sure! But why specifically do you think putting another copy of the identifier we put on the back on the front is such a problem?

@TechConnectify Honestly, I really don't have a problem with them. If Arizona implemented them I'd put one on. I used them in IL, ID, and UT.

My bigger issue is actually how automakers implement front plates. It makes me sick to have to drill permanent holes in my bumper.

And still, plates aren't working. The number of vehicles I see in a week with no plates, or expired plates, is shocking. There needs to be a better solution, or complement, to plates. Especially if cops don't care.

@weiln there is a backup system, though. It's called the VIN.

And like, while I agree that lack of enforcement is a problem, when actual issues occur that could be solved by there being a front plate, I'm not very sympathetic to the notion that it doesn't matter.

@weiln @TechConnectify that seems like an over the top reaction to mounting a legally mandated piece of equipment.

@TechConnectify Also, there is some vanity. Vehicles without front plates do look better. 🤷

But as I've matured, the vanity has taken a back seat to safety.

@weiln @TechConnectify
I feel like this is touching on a much bigger point: what problem are plates trying to solve, and are they doing it well? And if not, what would do it better? The first is obviously quick vehicle identification, and there I think rear plates have a lot of advantages: you're already looking out your front window at the bumper behind you whether you're a cop or someone looking for an Amber Alert (or similar).

@weiln @TechConnectify
It's much less good for:
- dashcams trying to ID a hit and run (resolution, front end collision)
- cops trying to get detailed vehicle info (requires lookup for most things)
- toll-by-plate (doesn't account for towed vehicles, transponders are more accurate)

That last point: we already have devices that wirelessly send information on a fixed frequency from a moving vehicle. This could solve all the above problems fairly nicely.

@ndm13 @TechConnectify Honestly this is where I was going with the comments about a complement to plates. So many things should be automatic at this point, and RFID in plates would be an interesting test case.

My thoughts also went to treating a car differently, in that each needs an ID, NOT the VIN, that would be associated electronically with the plate. Expired plates? No go. Reckless driving? Easy to identify.

But, IMO people REALLY want the ability to break the law without consequences.

@TechConnectify The one downside I’ve seen with front plates in Portland, because they also have registration stickers, is that they get stolen and re-used as illegal back places on similar-model cars. But that seems like a minor downside and ultimately fixable if the front/rear plates had distinctly different design elements.

@BrianEnigma you know what's funny? There have been actual solutions to this.

GM had a Buick I think where the rear license plate went in a slot that was only accessible from the trunk. So someone would have to break into the trunk to remove the license plate.

Something like that could be done on the front, too, if integration were considered something that needed to be done. But because of states that don't require front plates nobody bothers.

@TechConnectify @BrianEnigma seems like back and front plates could also be made visually distinct (a different colored blank) making it super obvious if they were installed in the wrong place. It would likely take a little education but seems like it might not be that hard.

@BrianEnigma @TechConnectify @jesses That's what we've done here for years, white at the front and yellow at the back.

@mark @BrianEnigma @TechConnectify Nice. The challenge I could see with it in the US is that our license plates are almost state branding a lot of the time which I could see leading to some opposition. That's not a good reason not to do it though.

@BrianEnigma @TechConnectify The US system for plates is weird. replacement plates or stickers every year? That seems just a bit dumb and backwards. It's all on computer already, so why not deal with it there? You didn't pay this year? They'll already know, and could flag your number.

@fuzzysteve @BrianEnigma I don't know. It seems pretty reasonable to me.

Here, the sticker changes color every year. So when you see a car with a sticker that's two colors old, you know at a glance that driver hasn't renewed their registration. No need to look anything up.

In fact, I would rather have mechanisms like that then require a bunch of cameras and or manual lookups.

@TechConnectify @fuzzysteve @BrianEnigma over here you pay for registration once when the vehicle is purchased, which pays for the administrative cost of registering your address with the state. Then there’s noting more to pay directly. The rest is paid for by tax on fuel (which is 2€/liter)

@TechConnectify @fuzzysteve @BrianEnigma Yea, but you have to balance that against the cost (non-zero) and the expectation of whether that sticker is ever going to catch anyone at all. PA gave up stickers several years ago, but I don't have data on whether that's a net plus or minus.

@mhkohne @fuzzysteve @BrianEnigma The way Illinois does it, the cost is pretty close to zero.

The stickers are part of a pre-made form that goes through a laser printer. That same form then becomes the thing you keep in your glove compartment with your information about registration and stuff.

Granted, I don't know what the actual cost is, but it's been cleverly integrated into a thing they already have to do and it's a standard laser printer doing the printing.

@mhkohne @fuzzysteve @BrianEnigma (although, funnily enough, there was a supply issue last year and the sticker for some reason wasn't printable. So they all just said "Illinois 23" but the color mechanism is the most important part.

It's not like the month on the sticker helps anyone out but the owner to know when their car is about to expire (or I guess maaaaybe parking lot enforcement)

@TechConnectify @fuzzysteve @BrianEnigma That's a good setup. PA's stickers were, I think, done separately, and I think they had a serial # on the sticker, so presumably they could figure out whose sticker it was, should the occasion arise. I suspect it never did.
I'd still love to see data on this subject - I think MD dropped the front plate some years ago? We had them when I was growing up, but I think they don't anymore, and I'd love to know the whys and whether anyone followed up.

@TechConnectify @mhkohne @fuzzysteve @BrianEnigma The UK way of doing this *used* to be that there was a separate registration form that went inside on the windshield; not on the plates. Small paper form, and being inside it didn't have any problems like that. We gave up about 10 years ago and it's now entirely electronic.

@TechConnectify @fuzzysteve @BrianEnigma in the UK car receive a registration plate when it's initially bought. It identifies the car until it's scrapped, unless an owner gets it changed for a vanity plate. Mandatory front and back, front and back are different colours white front, yellow back). As they don't usually need to be removed, anti tamper screws are used. Doesn't stop them being removed, it happens, but I guess makes it harder.

@TechConnectify @fuzzysteve @BrianEnigma Tax and yearly mandatory vehicle testing information stored in databases. Vehicles that aren't taxed need to be declared as off road. Registration information held on cars which must be updated to the new owner when sold. Information such as vehicle colour, make and model also held on the registration database. If you respray the car a different colour, you'd legally need to get the info updated.

Not sure if it's better or worse, maybe just different...

@MWelchUK @fuzzysteve @BrianEnigma personally, I would say that something that exists only in a database doesn't functionally exist.

For many things this doesn't matter. But for something like, say, this car is driving around unregistered and you don't know for sure whether or not the driver of that car should actually be driving that car, having a flag for that that's immediately visible without needing to look something up seems important.

@TechConnectify @fuzzysteve @BrianEnigma Um, enforcement vans have cameras with OCR and a network connection to the database. I believe any officers stopping a suspicious car can call in a check too.

@TechConnectify @fuzzysteve @BrianEnigma there's definitely a very different social acceptance to databases of "things that can kill people" in our countries. Since there's a legal requirement to tax and have vehicles pass a yearly road worthiness test here, I personally have no issue with a database that attempts to make sure all vehicles are complying with the rules in an as efficient way as possible.

@TechConnectify @fuzzysteve @BrianEnigma
Curious as to what registration means in a US context.
To drive on a public road in the in the UK you must have have a licence, be correctly insured, pay a road fund tax and have a valid MOT.
MOT is an annual vehicle road worthyness check.
You used to have to display a (road fund) tax disc with an expiry date on it. Now you still pay the tax but enforcement is mostly thru automatic license plate recognition cameras with hefty penalties if you don't pay.

@raymierussell @TechConnectify @BrianEnigma You also should be notifying the licensing department that a vehicle is off the road, thus not taxable. and undoing that when it's not.

@raymierussell @TechConnectify @fuzzysteve @BrianEnigma it's a mess, some have basic road worthiness tests other have environmental checks, some have both, because there's no federal standard the states are free to regulate as they choose.

@raymierussell @TechConnectify @fuzzysteve @BrianEnigma the biggest challenge in the US is that registration regulation is delegated to the 50 states and territories so we have 50+ different rules on everything

@TechConnectify @fuzzysteve @BrianEnigma
Do the stickers really mean anything other than the vehicle tax being paid? We we used to use coloured paper discs in the windscreen in the UK for this - it's not really the same type of information as the number on the plate, it doesn't need to be in the same place.
We no longer use them but I think it was a mistake - we seem to have more cars without valid tax now (though I haven't checked if we actually do).

@justNickoli Essentially yes, but it also validated that someone looked at the registration within the last year.

This all varies from state-to-state, but in Illinois the sticker means your registration is valid (which includes a $150 annual registration fee, which is the only state tax on the car).

When the registration expires, it not only means that the owner hasn't paid the fee but it also indicates the information about who is responsible for that car may be out-of-date.

@justNickoli

That can happen for plenty of innocent reasons, but it might indicate the plates were stolen, the *car* was stolen, or some other problem.

It's by no means a perfect solution - stickers can be forged, though they do have some anti-counterfeit measures - but I'm more comfortable with that serving as a flag for extra scrutiny than I am a system where every car is scrutinized all the time a la a database lookup.

@TechConnectify is it actually checked, though? My work involves enforcement where I'm looking up registration details and find deliberately false information far more of an issue than expired.
I don't think it's hugely common in general, but it is an issue among the vehicles likely to come to my attention.

@justNickoli You mean is the information checked? Because... not really. You are attesting that it's correct when renewing and there are consequences for not informing the secretary of state's office of an address change. But it's not like it's routinely audited.

If you mean are stickers checked... absolutely. Granted, we have armed police doing basic traffic enforcement which is... not good at all. I'd like to see that changed. But the stickers are a huge "check this car out" signal.

@justNickoli additional context: the secretary of state's office handles car stuff in Illinois but that's pretty weird. Most other states have a department of motor vehicles but we have this weird division of the SOS office called "driver services" or something like that.

Not really important but I thought I might have confused you by without this context.

@TechConnectify I agree - I don't think we should have got rid of the discs. I think the point I'm getting towards isn't that we should just rely on databases (though I'm less wary of them than you), but that the "check this out" marker on the car doesn't have to be in form of a licence plate sticker, so if licence plate stickers have problems, there are alternatives beyond relying on databases.

@TechConnectify @justNickoli The taxes vary based on car age here in Colorado. My car being 10 years old is only $56 to register, but brand new ones could be $600-2000 per year. (They decline for the first 5 years, freeze in price for 5 more years, then drop to almost nothing at 10 years.) It kind of acts as a Use-tax as well as a registration fee.

@kazriko @justNickoli Interesting. We do pay sales tax on the car (and even on the purchase of used cars above a certain amount) upon initial registration but that's a one-time thing. Annual renewal is fixed based on vehicle class

(and annoyingly EVs are an extra $100/yr but we're not paying fuel tax so I'm not bothered - just... slightly irritated)

@TechConnectify @justNickoli This is on top of the sales tax, our sales tax on cars was a bit higher than other nearby states, so people used to go to nearby states to buy cars, then they raised the registration costs to compensate for that.
@TechConnectify @justNickoli (They're trying to add a weight tax as well, justifying it as a "SUV" tax.)

@BrianEnigma@xoxo.zone @TechConnectify@mas.to With a few exceptions for things like classics with really old plates, British front plates are white, while rears are yellow.

Though I suppose it just means that you have to steal both plates...

@kim @BrianEnigma I like that! Here the only differentiator is that you don't put the renewal sticker on the front plate. But it's easy to fake a sticker.

@TechConnectify @kim @BrianEnigma

So Illinois splurges in two plates but cheaps out on a second sticker? That’s odd.

Virginia has two plates and two stickers.

@BrianEnigma @TechConnectify would also be fixed if having only one plate was cited instead of being viewed as an artistic expression.

@TechConnectify @weiln I live in a state where trucks can get away with one plate and that plate is on the front! Reason being that you might have a trailer sometimes. You see white dudes mostly do this because racist policing practices. One plate policies make no sense.

@TechConnectify @weiln agree with safety aspect!

Please stop drilling holes in our bumpers though… can we agree to stop that? 🥹

@weiln @AbsolutelyDerek so what we actually need then is a consistent requirement to have a front plate so that designers will think about that.

We don't solve this by saying let's not do front plates anymore.

@TechConnectify @AbsolutelyDerek Well if we're talking about fairy tales and make believe...

There are always solutions, and some are very easy. But hell will freeze over before the states can agree on anything.

Personally the older I get, the more I think it's not 1776 anymore, and how much we would benefit from a different arrangement of states vs federal power. Oh look, now we don't have 50 different ways of doing the SAME DAMNED THING. 🤯 Plates is an example of that.

@AbsolutelyDerek @TechConnectify @weiln what's the issue if the bumper is always hidden by the plate? It's not as if the plate is removed on a regular basis. Many countries successfully use sticky pads, no drill required.

@zymurgic @TechConnectify @weiln it is the damn holes! Sticky pads would be great or brackets.

Look at my poor i3

@TechConnectify @weiln Most states have both! I grew up in a state with only the rear ones and I must say, living in places with both hasn't been an issue at all. Much easier to know what the plate is when there are two instances.

@TechConnectify It's also extra dumb in states like Wyoming where legally you're supposed to have one, but I keep seeing idiots have something else instead and the cops don't seem to mind either.

@TechConnectify@mas.to @weiln@mas.to as a EU citizen the idea that some US states don't require a front license plate was and is kind of strange to me. i don't think there are any european states that don't have front license plates?

maybe also due to this wording from the Vienna Convention on Road Traffic:

Chapter III
CONDITIONS FOR THE ADMISSION OF MOTOR VEHICLES AND TRAILERS TO INTERNATIONAL TRAFFIC
[...]
Article 36: Registration number
1. Every motor vehicle in international traffic shall display its registration number at the front and at the rear; motor cycles, however, shall only be required to display this number at the rear.
[...]
-- https://treaties.un.org/doc/Treaties/1977/05/19770524%2000-13%20AM/Ch_XI_B_19.pdf p.42

Notably the US and Canada do not seem to be signatories of this treaty.