@dualityk@mastodon.sdf.org @scott that's fair, for sure.
But on the other hand, the reversal seems very sudden. I don't think the data would look like that given fleet-turnover rates, but that's just my intuition
@TechConnectify @dualityk @scott from https://www.epa.gov/automotive-trends/highlights-automotive-trends-report
Doesn't address the fleet-turnover at all, but suggest the changes in weight are less than I'd have expected from 2004 to 2020 (with a notable increase from 2020+). The average age of a car on the road is 12.5 years? (R&T) so you'd expect the combined fleet to look approximately like a moving average of this.
(This image should be a picture of the combined new car fleet)
@TechConnectify @dualityk@sdf.org @scott Similar to you, I struggle to find pedestrian collision rates that aren't the fatality rates. IIHS has pedestrian fatality rates: https://www.iihs.org/topics/fatality-statistics/detail/pedestrians
low in 2009, and then increasing since. That doesn't seem to match up cleanly with a hypothetical smoothed out weight or footprint from the fleet from above.
Edit: actually? Kinda might match up with the footprint data..
Edit2: What I can find about fatality rate suggests it's around 7.2%ish constantish
@TechConnectify @scott In the same timeframe, mobile phone penetration appears to have gone from 30% to 90%?
I admit, I don't see an obvious match in curve shape here. Looks more like footprint to me than cellphone adoption.
@TechConnectify @scott My personal general sense, with absolutely no evidence, is that distracted driving was at a low about 5 years ago? These days I'm shocked when I see someone obviously texting&driving, and I didn't used to be.
It's also been made illegal everywhere, and though enforcement is lacking (for good reasons: acab) I think that still has moved the needle some.
I can't pretend to have thoughts about distracted-walking. No clue.