If there isn’t much cross-platform engagement between the #threadiverse and #mastodon, and Reddit migrants leave because of insufficient activity … is this a failure of sorts of the #fediverse ?
I’m leaning yes. If cross-platform activity is essentially irrelevant but more of a minor awkward perk at times then the fediverse doesn’t exist (yet) at the level of being a social media platform or space.
Instead, it’s a tool for FOSS platforms to scale through decentralisation.
@maegul@hachyderm.io @fediversenews@venera.social
If they leave because there is not much interaction between link-aggregator types of software (as Wikipedia calls it) and Mastodon software, then it is the failure of those software, not the #Fediverse.
Always remember, the fediverse is ALL software communicating through the #ActivityPub protocol. Mastodon is a software. Lemmy is a software. Kbin is a software.
If your question is about the fediverse, then I don't see how this applies:
I’m leaning yes. If cross-platform activity is essentially irrelevant but more of a minor awkward perk at times then the fediverse doesn’t exist (yet) at the level of being a social media platform or space.Because there is a lot of engagement happening in the fediverse network. It is not a “minor awkward perk at times”
@youronlyone @fediversenews
Yea, not sure I entirely agree.
By "fediverse" I'm referring to the collective quality of the whole, however much any part is responsible.
I'm also presuming (accurately enough AFAICT) that interaction between mastodon users and #lemmy/#kbin is not high compared to interactions internal to #lemmy/#kbin.
Sure, the software has problems, but much of the attraction of the #threadiverse depends on the level of activity and number and size of communities.
1/
Part of the problem with getting a community based platform off of the ground is how to get sufficiently active communities. This is where the "fediverse" comes in. If the federation is a "killer feature", then arguably activity should spread across platforms and formats so that newer spaces and platforms become easier to seed over time.
You highlight that the problem is software not the protocol. I agree! But then ask what value the protocol provides.
2/
Generally, I'm probing at the possibility that too much is made of the protocol and not enough of the importance of getting the software right, not just specifically to a particular platform, but globally, in terms of the overall structures and designs of the platforms that are being built.
I think we might agree here somewhat.
Otherwise, you highlight that much activity occurs over the protocol. But that's between similar platforms. Lemmy<->Masto?
3/3
@jupiter_rowland oh or you can search for things like
!newcommunities@lemmy.world