The slimy, war-mongering New York Times caught in yet another lie. How does anyone take them seriously?
Aaron Maté
NYT's @carlottagall [on Twitter] has written an article promoting chemical weapons allegations against the recently ousted Assad government. It contains one of the sloppiest lies I've ever seen on this topic. Citing a Syrian military defector, Brig. Gen. Zaher al-Saket, Gall writes that the August 2013 chemical attack in Ghouta "was prepared and fired from the Sharyat air base." This is such a transparent falsehood, I can't believe it was printed. Homs is about 150 kilometers from Ghouta. It is physically impossible for the sarin rockets that hit Ghouta to have been launched from Homs. As the NYT itself had to admit in December 2013 -- contradicting the Obama admin at the time - "the rockets were most likely fired by multiple launchers and had a range of about three kilometers." This would implicate sectarian insurgents, who controlled areas within that range. Now the NYT, in its bid to spread Iraq WMD-level propaganda today, has stretched the attack zone out from three kilometers all the way to 150 kilometers, where they can find a Syrian military air base. Unfortunately their new location happens to be completely incompatible with reality.